Friday, June 19, 2026

The Crossroads of Choice

 


The image is inspired by one of the most enduring legends in American music.

It depicts Robert Johnson sitting alone at a lonely Mississippi crossroads late at night, guitar in hand. According to blues folklore, Johnson met a mysterious stranger at such a crossroads, who tuned his guitar and, in exchange for his soul, granted him extraordinary musical talent. Although there is no historical evidence that this ever happened, the story became inseparable from Johnson's legacy because of his astonishing skill, his mysterious life, and his death at just 27 years old.

The crossroads legend symbolizes more than a supernatural bargain. It has become a metaphor for the price of greatness, ambition, sacrifice, and the difficult choices that define a person's life. Whether viewed as myth, metaphor, or Southern folklore, it helped make Robert Johnson one of the most influential figures in the history of the blues, inspiring generations of musicians from Eric Clapton and Keith Richards to Jimi Hendrix.

The picture captures that legendary moment, not as documented history, but as one of America's greatest musical myths, where talent, mystery, and the unknown meet at a lonely crossroads under the moonlight.

 

The Crossroads of Choice

 

Over the years, I have spent a great deal of time observing people. Not as a psychologist or philosopher, but as a husband, father, worker, employer, and student of life. The older I get, the less certain I become that any single explanation can account for why some people succeed while others struggle. We are often told that the environment determines outcomes. Certainly, the environment matters. Poverty matters. Education matters. Family matters. Opportunity matters. I have no trouble acknowledging any of that.

But I have also seen too many exceptions. I grew up poor. By all accounts, I should have chosen the easier road like my father before me. I worked from the age of ten delivering newspapers, mowing lawns, and doing whatever jobs I could find. Later came night school, learning a trade, and building a career. Looking back, many of those decisions involved choosing discomfort today for a reward that would not arrive for years.

Why? I honestly do not know. Economists call it delayed gratification. Psychologists speak of self-control. Philosophers debate free will. Yet none of these explanations seems entirely satisfying. Recently, I began thinking about the difference between present value and future value. At every crossroads in life, there appears to be a choice. One road offers comfort now. The other offers the possibility of something greater later. The second road usually requires sacrifice, patience, discipline, and a measure of uncertainty. There are no guarantees.

Yet some people consistently choose the "future value over the present value." I struggle to understand why. I always thought, I am no one special, I am average, yet if I can do it, make a good life, well, anyway I can. Consider work, when I was growing up, it was common for young people to have jobs. We delivered newspapers, bagged groceries, swept floors, and mowed yards. The pay was not much, but perhaps the money was not the most important lesson. We learned that effort preceded reward. We learned that if we wanted something, we often had to wait and work for it. I had to mow 50 lawns at $2.00 per lawn at age 10 to buy a $100 bicycle. I had to deliver newspapers every day, seven days a week, for two months to buy that $100.00 bike. Today, many of those opportunities no longer exist or are far less common. Whether that matters, I do not know. But I wonder if those small experiences helped teach delayed gratification at an early age.

Then I think of my own family. My wife and her brother were raised by the same parents, in the same home, under the same roof. Yet their outcomes could not be more different. My wife worked throughout high school, became disciplined with money, attended college, and built a successful life. Her brother struggled repeatedly and lives in poverty today. My sister babysat at the age of 16, I think, but I do not remember her ever having a job when we were kids, and we are only 18 months apart in age. Today, she is poor, making bad decisions all her life, and I have made it on a high school education to millionaire status, plus some. Same parents, same environment. Different outcomes.

Then I think of my twins. Both were born premature. My son Jacob struggled more as an infant and spent his entire K-12 education under an Individualized Education Program. My daughter Abigail developed more easily in her early years. Different challenges. Different paths. Yet both graduated from college. Both became successful adults. Both worked from high school onward. Both had summer jobs in high school, and I made sure of that. Again, the simple explanations begin to break down. Environment clearly matters. Family clearly matters. Opportunity clearly matters. But they do not seem to explain everything. This leaves me with an uncomfortable conclusion. There appears to be something else at work. I call it choice. Not because I can define it. Not because I can measure it. Not because I fully understand it. In fact, the more I study it, the more elusive it becomes.

We can measure income, test scores, attendance, crime rates, and educational attainment. We can measure almost everything surrounding a choice. We cannot measure the choice itself. At some point, every person arrives at a crossroads. Present value or future value. Comfort now or sacrifice now for something greater later. Why one person turns left while another turns right remains one of life’s greatest mysteries. I do not claim to have the answer. I merely offer the observation. Perhaps the greatest question is not why some people fail. Perhaps the greater question is why some people willingly choose hardship today in pursuit of a future they cannot yet see.

 

That is the question I continue to wrestle with.


Wednesday, June 3, 2026

Human Conditioning: The Room, the Key, and the Choice


The Room, the Key, and the Choice

Human beings can be conditioned.

That statement is no longer controversial. Pavlov conditioned dogs to respond to bells. Skinner demonstrated reinforcement patterns. Bernays showed how mass persuasion could shape public opinion, desires, and behavior. Modern advertising, social media algorithms, political messaging, and institutional culture all operate on variations of the same principle: stimulus, reinforcement, response.

The deeper question is not whether humans are conditioned.

The deeper question is whether humans can become aware of the conditioning itself.

Most people never see the room they live in because the room feels normal. Culture becomes invisible precisely because it surrounds them completely. A fish rarely notices water. A person rarely notices the assumptions, incentives, fears, rewards, and narratives shaping his behavior because they arrive disguised as common sense, morality, entertainment, belonging, or survival.

Yet some people eventually sense something is wrong.

A contradiction appears. A wall cracks. The room darkens. The person begins asking questions that others no longer ask. Why do people react predictably to certain words? Why do entire groups move emotionally in sync? Why do societies repeat the same cycles under different names? Why does fear shape behavior so effectively? Why do comfort and approval seem to govern so many decisions?

Perhaps awareness begins there.

But awareness itself creates another problem.

If awareness brings freedom, what sustains freedom afterward?

History is full of intelligent and highly aware people who used their understanding not for wisdom, but for manipulation, domination, and power. Awareness alone does not create virtue. In fact, awareness without moral conscience may simply produce a more dangerous human being — one who understands the machinery of the cave better than everyone else inside it.

This may explain why older moral systems emphasized self-mastery so heavily. Stoics spoke of discipline over impulse. Religious traditions warned against pride, envy, greed, and appetite. Classical republics stressed civic virtue. Freemasonry teaches continual moral refinement. Different languages, perhaps, but all wrestling with the same reality: freedom collapses without internal restraint.

This is where the road divides.

One path leads toward conscience, discipline, humility, responsibility, and truth-seeking. The other leads toward appetite, ego, manipulation, tribalism, and power. The frightening part is that awareness itself does not determine which road a person chooses.

This raises the hardest question of all.

Is the choice truly free, or is even the chooser conditioned?


Perhaps there are two forms of conditioning:

  • the unconscious conditioning that shapes us before awareness,
  • and the consciously chosen structures we adopt after awareness.

Maybe no human being fully escapes conditioning. Maybe the real difference is whether we remain unconscious participants in it or become conscious stewards of what shapes us.

In that sense, freedom may not mean escaping all influence. Freedom may mean becoming aware enough to examine competing influences and deliberately choose which principles, disciplines, and truths will govern one’s life.

Not perfect freedom.

Not absolute independence from environment or biology. Perhaps something morally meaningful nonetheless.

The older I get, the less certain I become that I have solved this puzzle. Yet one thing feels increasingly true: once a person truly sees the room, the walls are never completely invisible again. Perhaps that awareness, incomplete, uncomfortable, and burdensome as it may be, is the beginning of wisdom itself.

America's Favorite Couple

If you have found your way to my blog and opened this page, then you have found an event my wife and I are participating in. You can find th...